Re: Should we warn against using too many partitions?
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-06-12T05:48:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 5:12 AM David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 14:53, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > The latest version looks good to me too. > > Pushed. Thank you all for the reviews. Thanks. I noticed a typo: "...able to handle partition hierarchies up a few thousand partitions" s/up/up to/g I'm inclined to add one more word though, as: "...able to handle partition hierarchies with up to a few thousand partitions" or "...able to handle partition hierarchies containing up to a few thousand partitions" Thanks, Amit
Commits
-
doc: Fix grammatical error in partitioning docs
- 1bbcbfaf7824 10.9 landed
- e23338cec4fb 11.4 landed
- ddc053dc503a 12.0 landed
-
doc: Add best practises section to partitioning docs
- 6e1dc84533e4 10.9 landed
- 936b5e589e04 11.4 landed
- e788e849addd 12.0 landed