Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Attachments
- v32-0001-Move-AcquireExecutorLocks-s-responsibility-into-.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v32-0001
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 4:01 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 12:52 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > Alright, I'll try to get something out early next week. Thanks for > > all the pointers. > > Sorry for the delay. Attached is what I've come up with so far. > > I didn't actually go with calling the plancache on every lock taken on > a relation, that is, in ExecGetRangeTableRelation(). One thing about > doing it that way that I didn't quite like (or didn't see a clean > enough way to code) is the need to complicate the ExecInitNode() > traversal for handling the abrupt suspension of the ongoing setup of > the PlanState tree. OK, I gave this one more try and attached is what I came up with. This adds a ExecPlanStillValid(), which is called right after anything that may in turn call ExecGetRangeTableRelation() which has been taught to lock a relation if EXEC_FLAG_GET_LOCKS has been passed in EState.es_top_eflags. That includes all ExecInitNode() calls, and a few other functions that call ExecGetRangeTableRelation() directly, such as ExecOpenScanRelation(). If ExecPlanStillValid() returns false, that is, if EState.es_cachedplan is found to have been invalidated after a lock being taken by ExecGetRangeTableRelation(), whatever funcion called it must return immediately and so must its caller and so on. ExecEndPlan() seems to be able to clean up after a partially finished attempt of initializing a PlanState tree in this way. Maybe my preliminary testing didn't catch cases where pointers to resources that are normally put into the nodes of a PlanState tree are now left dangling, because a partially built PlanState tree is not accessible to ExecEndPlan; QueryDesc.planstate would remain NULL in such cases. Maybe there's only es_tupleTable and es_relations that needs to be explicitly released and the rest is taken care of by resetting the ExecutorState context. On testing, I'm afraid we're going to need something like src/test/modules/delay_execution to test that concurrent changes to relation(s) in PlannedStmt.relationOids that occur somewhere between RevalidateCachedQuery() and InitPlan() result in the latter to be aborted and that it is handled correctly. It seems like it is only the locking of partitions (that are not present in an unplanned Query and thus not protected by AcquirePlannerLocks()) that can trigger replanning of a CachedPlan, so any tests we write should involve partitions. Should this try to test as many plan shapes as possible though given the uncertainty around ExecEndPlan() robustness or should manual auditing suffice to be sure that nothing's broken? On possibly needing to move permission checking to occur *after* taking locks, I realized that we don't really need to, because no relation that needs its permissions should be unlocked by the time we get to ExecCheckPermissions(); note we only check permissions of tables that are present in the original parse tree and RevalidateCachedQuery() should have locked those. I found a couple of exceptions to that invariant in that views sometimes appear not to be in the set of relations that RevalidateCachedQuery() locks. So, I invented PlannedStmt.viewRelations, a list of RT indexes of view RTEs that is populated in setrefs.c. ExecLockViewRelations() called before ExecCheckPermissions() locks those. -- Thanks, Amit Langote EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Stamp 19beta1.
- 4b0bf0788b06 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Revert "Don't lock partitions pruned by initial pruning"
- 1722d5eb05d8 18.0 landed
-
Ensure first ModifyTable rel initialized if all are pruned
- 28317de723b6 18.0 cited
-
Fix bug in cbc127917 to handle nested Append correctly
- cbb9086c9ef6 18.0 landed
-
Remove unstable test suite added by 525392d57
- 4f1b6e5bb4fe 18.0 landed
-
Don't lock partitions pruned by initial pruning
- 525392d5727f 18.0 landed
-
Fix an oversight in cbc127917 to handle MERGE correctly
- 75dfde13639a 18.0 landed
-
Track unpruned relids to avoid processing pruned relations
- cbc127917e04 18.0 landed
-
Perform runtime initial pruning outside ExecInitNode()
- d47cbf474ecb 18.0 landed
-
Move PartitionPruneInfo out of plan nodes into PlannedStmt
- bb3ec16e14de 18.0 landed
-
Fix setrefs.c's failure to do expression processing on prune steps.
- bf826ea06297 18.0 cited
-
Remove obsolete executor cleanup code
- d060e921ea5a 17.0 landed
-
Revert "Move PartitionPruneInfo out of plan nodes into PlannedStmt"
- 5472743d9e85 16.0 landed
-
Move PartitioPruneInfo out of plan nodes into PlannedStmt
- ec386948948c 16.0 landed
-
Refactor and cleanup runtime partition prune code a little
- 297daa9d4353 15.0 landed
-
Remove some unnecessary fields from Plan trees.
- 52ed730d511b 12.0 cited
-
Remove more redundant relation locking during executor startup.
- f2343653f5b2 12.0 cited
-
Shut down Gather's children before shutting down Gather itself.
- acf555bc53ac 10.0 cited