Re: remaining sql/json patches

amit <amitlangote09@gmail.com>

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-01-23T13:46:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. SQL/JSON: Various improvements to SQL/JSON query function docs

  2. SQL/JSON: Fix some obsolete comments.

  3. SQL/JSON: Fix issues with DEFAULT .. ON ERROR / EMPTY

  4. JSON_TABLE: Add support for NESTED paths and columns

  5. Fix JsonExpr deparsing to emit QUOTES and WRAPPER correctly

  6. Fix typo introduced in 6185c9737

  7. Add basic JSON_TABLE() functionality

  8. Avoid splitting errmsg string to span multiple lines

  9. Add SQL/JSON query functions

  10. Implement various jsonpath methods

  11. Add soft error handling to some expression nodes

  12. Adjust populate_record_field() to handle errors softly

  13. Refactor code used by jsonpath executor to fetch variables

  14. Test EXPLAIN (FORMAT JSON) ... XMLTABLE

  15. Simplify productions for FORMAT JSON [ ENCODING name ]

  16. Add trailing commas to enum definitions

  17. doc: add missing <returnvalue> and whitespace

  18. Add more SQL/JSON constructor functions

  19. Rename a nonterminal used in SQL/JSON grammar

  20. Some refactoring to export json(b) conversion functions

  21. Don't include CaseTestExpr in JsonValueExpr.formatted_expr

  22. Code review for commit b6e1157e7d

  23. Pass constructName to transformJsonValueExpr()

  24. Unify JSON categorize type API and export for external use

  25. Make some indentation in gram.y consistent

  26. Allow most keywords to be used as column labels without requiring AS.

  27. Reduce size of backend scanner's tables.

  28. Use perfect hashing, instead of binary search, for keyword lookup.

Attachments

On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 1:19 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2024-Jan-18, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > commands/explain.c (Hmm, I think this is a preexisting bug actually)
> > >
> > >     3893          18 :         case T_TableFuncScan:
> > >     3894          18 :             Assert(rte->rtekind == RTE_TABLEFUNC);
> > >     3895          18 :             if (rte->tablefunc)
> > >     3896           0 :                 if (rte->tablefunc->functype == TFT_XMLTABLE)
> > >     3897           0 :                     objectname = "xmltable";
> > >     3898             :                 else            /* Must be TFT_JSON_TABLE */
> > >     3899           0 :                     objectname = "json_table";
> > >     3900             :             else
> > >     3901          18 :                 objectname = NULL;
> > >     3902          18 :             objecttag = "Table Function Name";
> > >     3903          18 :             break;
> >
> > Indeed
>
> I was completely wrong about this, and in order to gain coverage the
> only thing we needed was to add an EXPLAIN that uses the JSON format.
> I did that just now.  I think your addition here works just fine.

I think we'd still need your RangeTblFunc.tablefunc_name in order for
the new code (with JSON_TABLE) to be able to set objectname to either
"XMLTABLE" or "JSON_TABLE", no?

As you pointed out, rte->tablefunc is always NULL in
ExplainTargetRel() due to setrefs.c setting it to NULL, so the
JSON_TABLE additions to explain.c in my patch as they were won't work.
I've included your patch in the attached set and adjusted the
JSON_TABLE patch to set tablefunc_name in the parser.

I had intended to push 0001-0004 today, but held off to add a
SQL-callable testing function for the changes in 0002.  On that note,
I'm now not so sure about committing jsonpath_exec.c functions
JsonPathExists/Query/Value() from their SQL/JSON counterparts, so
inclined to squash that one into the SQL/JSON query functions patch
from a testability standpoint.

I haven't looked at Jian He's comments yet.




--
Thanks, Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com