Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Attachments
- v60-0002-Perform-runtime-initial-pruning-outside-ExecInit.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v60-0002
- v60-0001-Move-PartitionPruneInfo-out-of-plan-nodes-into-P.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v60-0001
- v60-0003-Defer-locking-of-runtime-prunable-relations-in-c.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v60-0003
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 4:58 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > To summarize how extensions can be affected: > > 1. Plan invalidation during standard_ExecutorStart(): A plan tree > originating from a CachedPlan can become invalid during > standard_ExecutorStart() due to locks taken on leaf partitions that > survive initial pruning. Extensions should be updated to handle this > scenario by checking ExecPlanStillValid(estate) immediately after > calling standard_ExecutorStart() in their ExecutorStart_hook. If it > returns false, the extensions should avoid further processing. > > 2. Validation of RT indexes: If the plan tree remains valid, any > direct manipulation of relations using RT indexes must first verify > that the RT index is present in the EState.es_unpruned_relids > bitmapset. This bitmapset includes: a) RT indexes of relations that > are originally unprunable (and locked during GetCachedPlan()), and > b) RT indexes of leaf partitions that survive initial partition > pruning. This step is crucial because pruned relations are not locked. > Additionally, with the update in 0004, attempting to open pruned > relations using ExecGetRangeTableRelation() will result in an error. > > I’d love to hear from anyone maintaining executor hooks, such as those > from Timescale, Citus, or other extension developers. Please give this > patch set (0001-0004) a try and let me know if you run into any issues > or have feedback. 0005 is a sketch of an approach that eliminates the > need for extensions to check ExecPlanStillValid() in their > ExecutorStart_hook. I’ve rebased over recent changes to setrefs.c (commit bf826ea0629). During the rebase, I realized that the patch 0002-Initialize-PartitionPruneContexts-lazily wasn’t a good idea after all. The test case added by bf826ea0629 highlighted an issue: initializing pruning expressions lazily during execution could leave the Append/MergeAppend node’s PlanState.subPlan uninitialized at ExecInitNode() time. Initially, I thought this would have only cosmetic consequences -- such as changes in test case output where SubPlans referenced in "exec" pruning expressions wouldn’t appear -- but I may have underestimated the problem. As a result, I’ve abandoned that approach and the patch in favor of initializing all pruning expressions during plan initialization. Additionally, I revisited the impact of the main patch on ExecutorStart_hooks. It seems better to change the return type from void to bool, returning the result of ExecPlanStillValid(queryDesc->estate). This change has the added benefit of breaking extensions that use ExecutorStart_hook at compile time, encouraging authors to update their code. The updated commit message includes details on additional checks extensions must implement, particularly for cases where they might access pruned and thus unlocked relations. I've stared at the refactoring patches 0001 and 0002 for long enough at this point that I'd like to commit them early next week, barring further comments or objections. I'll keep staring at 0003. -- Thanks, Amit Langote
Commits
-
Stamp 19beta1.
- 4b0bf0788b06 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Revert "Don't lock partitions pruned by initial pruning"
- 1722d5eb05d8 18.0 landed
-
Ensure first ModifyTable rel initialized if all are pruned
- 28317de723b6 18.0 cited
-
Fix bug in cbc127917 to handle nested Append correctly
- cbb9086c9ef6 18.0 landed
-
Remove unstable test suite added by 525392d57
- 4f1b6e5bb4fe 18.0 landed
-
Don't lock partitions pruned by initial pruning
- 525392d5727f 18.0 landed
-
Fix an oversight in cbc127917 to handle MERGE correctly
- 75dfde13639a 18.0 landed
-
Track unpruned relids to avoid processing pruned relations
- cbc127917e04 18.0 landed
-
Perform runtime initial pruning outside ExecInitNode()
- d47cbf474ecb 18.0 landed
-
Move PartitionPruneInfo out of plan nodes into PlannedStmt
- bb3ec16e14de 18.0 landed
-
Fix setrefs.c's failure to do expression processing on prune steps.
- bf826ea06297 18.0 cited
-
Remove obsolete executor cleanup code
- d060e921ea5a 17.0 landed
-
Revert "Move PartitionPruneInfo out of plan nodes into PlannedStmt"
- 5472743d9e85 16.0 landed
-
Move PartitioPruneInfo out of plan nodes into PlannedStmt
- ec386948948c 16.0 landed
-
Refactor and cleanup runtime partition prune code a little
- 297daa9d4353 15.0 landed
-
Remove some unnecessary fields from Plan trees.
- 52ed730d511b 12.0 cited
-
Remove more redundant relation locking during executor startup.
- f2343653f5b2 12.0 cited
-
Shut down Gather's children before shutting down Gather itself.
- acf555bc53ac 10.0 cited