Re: table partitioning and access privileges
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-02-03T05:26:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 2:07 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > On 2020/02/03 11:05, Amit Langote wrote: > > Okay. How about the attached? > > Thanks for the patches! You added the note just after the description > about row level security on inherited table, but isn't it better to > add it before that? Attached patch does that. Thought? Yeah, that might be a better flow for that paragraph. > > Maybe, we should also note the LOCK TABLE exception? > > Yes. Note that, unlike TRUNCATE, LOCK TABLE exception exists in HEAD too, but maybe you're aware of that. Thanks, Amit
Commits
-
Make inherited LOCK TABLE perform access permission checks on parent table only.
- b7e51b350c4e 13.0 landed
-
Add note about access permission checks by inherited TRUNCATE and LOCK TABLE.
- bf1840255123 9.4.26 landed
- 990acfc656c0 9.5.21 landed
- ebf273000a57 9.6.17 landed
- 87f738dafbe1 10.12 landed
- 0d233f458ff6 11.7 landed
- 4988d7e96953 12.2 landed
-
Revert commit 56bc82a511.
- d034ab0bb2ae 9.4.26 landed
-
Revert commit 606f350de9.
- dc06d0839a33 9.5.21 landed
-
Revert commit 928e755d22.
- c15b17f9276e 9.6.17 landed
-
Revert commit 4b96c03a0a.
- 8b1a6499d055 10.12 landed
-
Revert commit a5b652f3a0.
- ea7857dddb54 11.7 landed
-
Revert commit de0177788b.
- 0d9f307cf82a 12.2 landed
-
Make inherited TRUNCATE perform access permission checks on parent table only.
- 56bc82a51117 9.4.26 landed
- 606f350de92a 9.5.21 landed
- 928e755d22de 9.6.17 landed
- 4b96c03a0a2a 10.12 landed
- a5b652f3a011 11.7 landed
- de0177788bf3 12.2 landed
- e6f1e560e4c6 13.0 landed
-
Regression tests for LOCK TABLE.
- ac33c7e2c130 9.4.0 cited