Re: Problem with default partition pruning
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com>, shawn wang <shawn.wang.pg@gmail.com>, Shawn Wang <shawn.wang@highgo.ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-08-02T01:30:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 9:49 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2019-Jul-31, Amit Langote wrote: > > I noticed that the patch is still marked as "Waiting on Author" ever > > since Shawn set it that way on June 17. Since Hosoya-san posted > > updated patches on June 27, the status should've been changed to > > "Needs Review". Or maybe "Ready for Committer", because the last time > > I looked, at least the default partition pruning issue seems to be > > sufficiently taken care of by the latest patch. Whether or not we > > should apply the other patch (more aggressive use of constraint > > exclusion by partprune.c on partitioned partitions), I'm not sure, but > > maybe a committer can decide in an instant. :) > > Thanks for the status update. I intend to get this patch pushed before > the next set of minors. Thank you Alvaro. Regards, Amit
Commits
-
Don't constraint-exclude partitioned tables as much
- 815ef2f568c7 13.0 landed
-
Apply constraint exclusion more generally in partitioning
- 4e85642d935e 13.0 landed
-
Improve pruning of a default partition
- e3967a16d3a0 11.5 landed
- 86544071484a 12.0 landed
- 489247b0e615 13.0 landed
-
Doc: Fix event trigger firing table
- 44460d7017cd 13.0 cited
-
Remove obsolete nbtree insertion comment.
- 489e431ba56b 12.0 cited