Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
amit <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-03-18T03:06:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE issue
- 12fb189bfeaf 13.0 landed
-
Allow publishing partition changes via ancestors
- 83fd4532a721 13.0 landed
-
Add logical replication support to replicate into partitioned tables
- f1ac27bfda6c 13.0 landed
-
Refactor code to look up local replication tuple
- d8653f468789 13.0 landed
-
Some refactoring of logical/worker.c
- 97ee604d9bce 13.0 landed
-
Prepare to support non-tables in publications
- c314c147c056 13.0 landed
-
Support adding partitioned tables to publication
- 17b9e7f9fe23 13.0 landed
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 9:49 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> I was trying to extract some preparatory work from the remaining patches
> and came up with the attached. This is part of your patch 0003, but
> also relevant for part 0004. The problem was that COPY (SELECT *) is
> not sufficient when the table has generated columns, so we need to build
> the column list explicitly.
>
> Thoughts?
Thank you for that.
+ if (isnull || !remote_is_publishable)
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errmsg("table \"%s.%s\" on the publisher is not publishable",
+ nspname, relname)));
Maybe add a one-line comment above this to say it's an "not supposed
to happen" error or am I missing something? Wouldn't elog() suffice
for this?
Other than that, looks good.
--
Thank you,
Amit