Re: Views no longer in rangeTabls?
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-13T04:09:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v1-0001-Retain-relkind-too-in-RTE_SUBQUERY-entries-for-vi.patch (application/x-patch) patch v1-0001
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 10:27 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> writes: > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 08:56:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> - rte->relkind = 0; > > > and also handle that field in (read|out)funcs.c > > Oh, right. Ugh, that means a catversion bump. It's not like > we've never done that during beta, but it's kind of an annoying > cost for a detail as tiny as this. OK, so how about the attached? I considered adding Assert(relkind == RELKIND_VIEW) in all places that have the "rte->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY && OidIsValid(rte->relid)" condition, but that seemed like an overkill, so only added one in the #ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING block in ExecCheckPermissions() that f75cec4fff877 added. -- Thanks, Amit Langote EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Retain relkind too in RTE_SUBQUERY entries for views.
- 0f8cfaf8921f 16.0 landed