Re: Problem with default partition pruning

Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>

To: yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com>

Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, shawn wang <shawn.wang.pg@gmail.com>, Shawn Wang <shawn.wang@highgo.ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2019-08-07T06:38:53Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:30 PM yuzuko <yuzukohosoya@gmail.com> wrote:
> > In short, I propose to get this done as the patch I posted in
> > https://postgr.es/m/20190806133053.GA23706@alvherre.pgsql
> >
> I agree with your proposal.  Also, I confirmed a default partition was pruned
> as expected with your patch.

+1.

Thanks,
Amit

Commits

Don't constraint-exclude partitioned tables as much
- 815ef2f568c7 13.0 landed
Apply constraint exclusion more generally in partitioning
- 4e85642d935e 13.0 landed
Improve pruning of a default partition
- e3967a16d3a0 11.5 landed
- 86544071484a 12.0 landed
- 489247b0e615 13.0 landed
Doc: Fix event trigger firing table
- 44460d7017cd 13.0 cited
Remove obsolete nbtree insertion comment.
- 489e431ba56b 12.0 cited