Thread
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix off-by-one in repack index loop
- b5f92b8eb439 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve compiler code layout in elog/ereport ERROR calls
- 913ec71d682e 14.0 cited
-
off-by-one in pg_repack index loop
Lakshmi N <lakshmin.jhs@gmail.com> — 2026-04-14T07:34:54Z
Hi hackers, foreach_current_index returns a 0-based index so list_length also takes a 0-based index. Perhaps the check should be list_length(ind_oids_new) <= pos? Please find the attached patch. int pos = foreach_current_index(ind_old); if (unlikely(list_length(ind_oids_new) < pos)) elog(ERROR, "list of new indexes too short"); ident_idx_new = list_nth_oid(ind_oids_new, pos); break; Regards, Lakshmi -
Re: off-by-one in pg_repack index loop
Xiaopeng Wang <wxp_728@163.com> — 2026-04-15T02:07:51Z
在 2026/4/14 15:34, Lakshmi N 写道: > Hi hackers, > > foreach_current_index returns a 0-based index so > list_length also takes a 0-based index. Perhaps the > check should be list_length(ind_oids_new) <= pos? > Please find the attached patch. > > int pos = foreach_current_index(ind_old); > > if (unlikely(list_length(ind_oids_new) < pos)) > elog(ERROR, "list of new indexes too short"); > ident_idx_new = list_nth_oid(ind_oids_new, pos); > break; > > Regards, > Lakshmi This fix looks correct to me. Both foreach_current_index(), so 0<=pos<list_length is expected. Regard, Xiaopeng Wang
-
Re: off-by-one in pg_repack index loop
John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> — 2026-04-29T07:16:08Z
On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 2:35 PM Lakshmi N <lakshmin.jhs@gmail.com> wrote: > if (unlikely(list_length(ind_oids_new) < pos)) > elog(ERROR, "list of new indexes too short"); > ident_idx_new = list_nth_oid(ind_oids_new, pos); > break; If we're going to change this, let's also get rid of the "unlikely", since it's just a noise word here -- see commit 913ec71d6. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
-
Re: off-by-one in pg_repack index loop
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> — 2026-05-04T18:02:01Z
On 2026-Apr-29, John Naylor wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 2:35 PM Lakshmi N <lakshmin.jhs@gmail.com> wrote: > > if (unlikely(list_length(ind_oids_new) < pos)) > > elog(ERROR, "list of new indexes too short"); > > ident_idx_new = list_nth_oid(ind_oids_new, pos); > > break; > > If we're going to change this, let's also get rid of the "unlikely", > since it's just a noise word here -- see commit 913ec71d6. Thanks, pushed that way. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Computing is too important to be left to men." (Karen Spärck Jones)