Re: Making pg_rewind faster
John H <johnhyvr@gmail.com>
From: John H <johnhyvr@gmail.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, Justin Kwan <justinpkwan@outlook.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
vignesh <vignesh@cloudflare.com>, vignesh ravichandran <admin@viggy28.dev>,
"hlinnaka@iki.fi" <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, "jkwan@cloudflare.com" <jkwan@cloudflare.com>
Date: 2025-07-01T18:13:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pg_rewind: Skip copy of WAL segments generated before point of divergence
- 5173bfd0443e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
pg_rewind: Extend code detecting relation files to work with WAL files
- 6ae08d9583e9 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split TESTDIR into TESTLOGDIR and TESTDATADIR
- c47885bd8b69 16.0 cited
Attachments
- 0004-Avoid-copying-WAL-segments-before-divergence-to-spee.patch (application/x-patch) patch 0004
Hi, I've attached an updated version of the patch against master with the changes suggested. On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:03 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:08:45PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> >> There may be something I am missing here, but there is no need to care >> about segments with a TLI older than lastcommontliIndex, no? Hard to say. pg_rewind is intended to make the same "copy" of the cluster which implies pg_wal/ should look the same. There might be use cases around logical replication where you would want these WAL files to still exist even across promotions? >> decide_wal_file_action() assumes that the WAL segment exists on the >> target and the source. This looks bug-prone to me without at least an >> assertion. From previous refactors there is now an Assertion in filemap.c decide_file_action that handles this. > Assert(entry->target_exists && entry->source_exists); decide_wal_file_action is called after the assertion. Thanks, -- John Hsu - Amazon Web Services