Horton

Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d.ivanov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Date: 2016-12-16T20:33:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 12/16/16 11:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> If we were going to do anything about this,
> my vote would be to remove sql_inheritance.

Go for it.

Let's also remove the table* syntax then.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Replace enum InhOption with simple boolean.

  2. Remove sql_inheritance GUC.