Re: Use FD_CLOEXEC on ListenSockets (was Re: Refactoring backend fork+exec code)
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Avoid 0-length memcpy to NULL with EXEC_BACKEND
- 95219c020c3c 17.0 landed
- f3412a61f3f9 18.0 landed
-
Tighten check for --forkchild argument when spawning child process
- 1906b1e0ad96 17.0 landed
- a06e8f84a1ac 18.0 landed
-
Add missing PGDLLIMPORT markings
- 768ceeeaa127 17.0 cited
-
Remove assertions that some compiler say are tautological
- d63d486d6c39 17.0 landed
-
Move code for backend startup to separate file
- 05c3980e7f47 17.0 landed
-
Refactor postmaster child process launching
- aafc05de1bf5 17.0 landed
-
Move some functions from postmaster.c to a new source file
- f1baed18bc3d 17.0 landed
-
Split registration of Win32 deadchild callback to separate function
- 14cddee9cce3 17.0 landed
-
Improve log messages referring to background worker processes
- a3f349c61292 17.0 landed
-
Move initialization of the Port struct to the child process
- 4945e4ed4a72 17.0 landed
-
Pass CAC as an argument to the backend process
- d162c3a73bf1 17.0 landed
-
Set socket options in child process after forking
- 73f7fb2a4c44 17.0 landed
-
Fix references to renamed function in comments
- ef4cfdce0ef8 17.0 landed
-
Use MyBackendType in more places to check what process this is
- 393b5599e517 17.0 landed
-
Remove MyAuxProcType, use MyBackendType instead
- 067701f57758 17.0 landed
-
Replace BackendIds with 0-based ProcNumbers
- 024c52111757 17.0 landed
-
Redefine backend ID to be an index into the proc array
- ab355e3a88de 17.0 landed
-
Remove superfluous 'pgprocno' field from PGPROC
- 28f3915b73f7 17.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect comment on how BackendStatusArray is indexed
- 28215a32b515 14.11 landed
- 90ccc9bf90a9 15.6 landed
- 4cf9ef670e4c 16.2 landed
- 2b53a462cff0 17.0 landed
-
Refactor how InitProcess is called
- fd5e8b440dfd 17.0 landed
-
Pass BackgroundWorker entry in the parameter file in EXEC_BACKEND mode
- 388491f1e5e6 17.0 landed
-
Refactor CreateSharedMemoryAndSemaphores
- 69d903367cde 17.0 landed
-
Silence Valgrind complaint with EXEC_BACKEND
- b19890d49d12 17.0 landed
-
Adjust obsolete comment explaining set_stack_base().
- cf84755575d1 16.2 landed
- 3b51265ee307 17.0 landed
-
Print lwlock stats also for aux processes, when built with LWLOCK_STATS
- f93133a250c6 17.0 landed
-
Move canAcceptConnections check from ProcessStartupPacket to caller.
- 16671ba6e717 17.0 landed
-
Fix crash on syslogger startup
- 5da0a622e889 17.0 landed
-
Refactor ListenSocket array.
- e29c46439511 17.0 landed
-
Use FD_CLOEXEC on ListenSockets
- b0bea38705b2 17.0 landed
-
Don't leak descriptors into subprograms.
- 1da569ca1f1f 16.0 cited
-
Use WaitEventSet API for postmaster's event loop.
- 7389aad63666 16.0 cited
-
Rearrange postmaster's startup sequence for better syslogger results.
- 9a86f03b4e8c 13.0 cited
-
Fix and enhance the assertion of no palloc's in a critical section.
- 1c6821be31f9 9.5.0 cited
On 29/08/2023 01:28, Michael Paquier wrote: > > In case you've not noticed: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZOvvuQe0rdj2slA9@paquier.xyz > But it does not really matter now ;) Ah sorry, missed that thread. >> Yes, so it seems. Syslogger is started before the ListenSockets array is >> initialized, so its still all zeros. When syslogger is forked, the child >> process tries to close all the listen sockets, which are all zeros. So >> syslogger calls close(0) MAXLISTEN (64) times. Attached patch moves the >> array initialization earlier. > > Yep, I've reached the same conclusion. Wouldn't it be cleaner to move > the callback registration of CloseServerPorts() closer to the array > initialization, though? Ok, pushed that way. I checked the history of this: it goes back to commit 9a86f03b4e in version 13. The SysLogger_Start() call used to be later, after setting p ListenSockets, but that commit moved it. So I backpatched this to v13. >> The first close(0) actually does have an effect: it closes stdin, which is >> fd 0. That is surely accidental, but I wonder if we should indeed close >> stdin in child processes? The postmaster process doesn't do anything with >> stdin either, although I guess a library might try to read a passphrase from >> stdin before starting up, for example. > > We would have heard about that, wouldn't we? I may be missing > something of course, but on HEAD, the array initialization is done > before starting any child processes, and the syslogger is the first > one forked. Yes, syslogger is the only process that closes stdin. After moving the initialization, it doesn't close it either. Thinking about this some more, the ListenSockets array is a bit silly anyway. We fill the array starting from index 0, always append to the end, and never remove entries from it. It would seem more straightforward to keep track of the used size of the array. Currently we always loop through the unused parts too, and e.g. ConfigurePostmasterWaitSet() needs to walk the array to count how many elements are in use. -- Heikki Linnakangas Neon (https://neon.tech)