Re: Removing unneeded self joins

Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>

From: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark.cfm@gmail.com>, Michał Kłeczek <michal@kleczek.org>, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-03-07T06:03:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Remove GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE from enable_self_join_elimination

  2. Put enable_self_join_elimination into postgresql.conf.sample

  3. Get rid of ojrelid local variable in remove_rel_from_query()

  4. Implement Self-Join Elimination

  5. Revert: Remove useless self-joins

  6. Replace lateral references to removed rels in subqueries

  7. Replace relids in lateral subquery parse tree during SJE

  8. Forbid SJE with result relation

  9. Fix misuse of RelOptInfo.unique_for_rels cache by SJE

  10. Replace the relid in some missing fields during SJE

  11. Revert 56-bit relfilenode change and follow-up commits.

  12. Stabilize timetz test across DST transitions.

  13. Speed up finding EquivalenceClasses for a given set of rels

  14. Fix mark-and-restore-skipping test case to not be a self-join.

On 26/2/2025 13:14, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:22 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 24/2/2025 11:57, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>>> Could you, please, elaborate more on what you mean by "new technique
>>> of query tree reduction"?
>> I mean any transformations and optimisations that reduce search space
>> for optimisation. Right now, I see the features reduce_unique_semijoins,
>> remove_useless_joins, and remove_useless_self_joins.
>> In practice, I see at least a join on a foreign key, where some cases
>> potentially allow the removal of the JOIN operator.
> 
> Do you mean some generic facility, which generalizes all the
> transformations you mentioned?  If so, it would be cool.  But how
> could it look like?
I think we may realise what it may look like by attempting to implement 
more RelOptInfo-removal features. Right now, I have only vague ideas on 
that subject. Just for reference, there were other discussions on join 
removal [1 - 5] and some blog posts explaining Oracle techniques in this 
area - see, for example, [6].

[1] inner join removal
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/AANLkTinS_MlZ2F3Siwgcje--qf5nTJTpuHFnZdcA45bU%40mail.gmail.com
[2] Patch to support SEMI and ANTI join removal
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAApHDvpCBEfuc5tD%3DvniepAv0pU5m%3Dq%3DfOQZcOdMHeei7OQPgQ%40mail.gmail.com
[3] Removing INNER JOINs
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAApHDvocUEYdt1uT+DLDPs2xEu=v3qJGT6HeXKonQM4rY_OsSA@mail.gmail.com#CAApHDvocUEYdt1uT+DLDPs2xEu=v3qJGT6HeXKonQM4rY_OsSA@mail.gmail.com
[4] WIP Join Removal
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1220176372.4371.118.camel%40ebony.2ndQuadrant
[5] Join Removal/ Vertical Partitioning
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1214477827.3845.87.camel%40ebony.site
[6] Oracle Join Elimination
https://oracle-base.com/articles/misc/join-elimination

-- 
regards, Andrei Lepikhov