Re: basic_archive lost archive_directory

31.01.2026 19:08, Álvaro Herrera пишет:
> On 2026-Jan-29, Олег Самойлов wrote:
>
>> 2026-01-23 18:46:49.970 MSK,,,12085,,697397e9.2f35,1,,2026-01-23 18:46:49
>> MSK,,0,WARNING,22023,"invalid value for parameter
>> ""basic_archive.archive_directory"": ""/mnt/ocean/postgres/stars/
>> WAL""","Specified archive directory does not exist.",,,,,,,,"","archiver",,0
> Most likely, the NFS mount was lost for some reason.  Did you check the
> kernel logs?  Did you ask your colleagues if they unmounted the
> filesystem for laughs?  Did you search for any funny logs on the NFS
> server side?

May be this is the reason for the first message and this is not a bug. 
This can be with NFS.

>> 2026-01-23 18:57:23.589 MSK,,,12085,,697397e9.2f35,2,,2026-01-23 18:46:49
>> MSK,,0,WARNING,01000,"""archive_mode"" enabled, yet archiving is not
>> configured","basic_archive.archive_directory is not
>> set.",,,,,,,,"","archiver",,0
>> And directory existed and it has old WAL files (before error raised).
>> The basic_archive is unstable, but I don't know how to repeat this.
> It's difficult to believe that it was basic_archive's fault; it's just
> giving you whatever the kernel reported to a stat() call for the
> directory.
The bug is here. basic_archive lost the value and was empty. But show 
all; show that the value is.