Re: pg_combinebackup: correct code comment.

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-04-15T13:41:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. pg_combinebackup: Fix incorrect code documentation

> On 15 Apr 2025, at 14:41, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 3:46 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>>> On 15 Apr 2025, at 06:22, Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Attached is a patch that corrects the code comment for
>>> process_directory_recursively() in pg_combinebackup, where the comment
>>> incorrectly refers to "output_directory" instead of the intended
>>> "input_directory".
>> 
>> Agreed.  The second paragraph in the comment also seem a bit odd, how about the
>> below while we are there fixing things?
>> 
>> - * If processing is a user-defined tablespace, the tsoid should be the OID
>> + * If processing a user-defined tablespace, the tsoid should be the OID
> 
> Yeah, I agree with both of these changes. Feel free to commit, unless
> you want me to do it.

No worries, I had this staged anyways from looking at Amul's patch so done as
7ae13170ba5 with a backpatch to 17 as it was a documentation fix and not just a
typo fix.

--
Daniel Gustafsson