Re: Avoid resource leak (src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dumpall.c)
Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
From: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-03-09T00:04:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On Mar 9, 2026, at 07:05, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi. > > Per Coverity. > > Coverity complains about one resource leak in the function > *drops_DBs*. > > CID 1645454: (#1 of 1): Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK) > 19. leaked_storage: Variable delQry going out of scope leaks the storage it points to. > > Fix by avoiding creating the buffer unnecessarily. > > Trivial patch attached. > > best regards, > Ranier Vilela > <avoid-resource-leak-pg_dumpall.patch> I confirmed this is a leak, but only leaks 3 tuples, not much memory leaked. Given pg_dump call is not a long-live frontend process, such leak won’t hurt much. Instead of claiming a memory leak, I would tend to claim a logic mistake. Because createPQExpBuffer is before the “if” clause, but the corresponding destroyPQExpBuffer is placed inside the “if” clause, they are logically mismatch. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
pg_dumpall: simplify coding of dropDBs()
- a198c26dede5 19 (unreleased) landed