Re: clean up docs for v12
Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-05-21T04:35:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi Paul, On 2019/05/21 13:25, Paul A Jungwirth wrote: > I'm sorry if this is the wrong place for this or it's already been > covered (I did scan though this whole thread and a couple others), but > I noticed the docs at > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/ddl-partitioning.html still say > you can't create a foreign key referencing a partitioned table, even > though the docs for > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/sql-createtable.html have been > updated (compared to v11). My understanding is that foreign keys > *still* don't work as expected when pointing at traditional INHERITS > tables, but they *will* work with declaratively-partitioned tables. You're right. I think it's simply an oversight of f56f8f8da6, which missed updating ddl.sgml > (I've also attached it as a patch file.) In other words, we should > move this caveat from the section on declaratively-partitioned tables > to the section on inheritance-partitioned tables. > > Sorry again if this is the wrong conversation for this! Thanks for the patch. To avoid it getting lost in the discussions of this thread, it might be better to post the patch to a separate thread. Thanks, Amit
Commits
-
Improve code inferring length of bitmap for JITed tuple deforming.
- 3a48005b0049 12.0 landed
-
Fix more typos and inconsistencies in documentation
- ac8623760377 12.0 landed
-
Fix collection of typos and grammar mistakes in docs and comments
- 148266fa354a 12.0 landed
-
Clean up some documentation for log_statement_sample_rate
- bc540f98599b 12.0 landed