Re: Multiple Columns Keys - Good or Bad idea?
Rob Brown-Bayliss <rob@zoostation.cc>
From: Rob Brown-Bayliss <rob@ZOOstation.cc>
To: PGSQL Novice List <pgsql-novice@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-06-13T03:43:25Z
Lists: pgsql-novice
> I'd go for the first method. If you need to refer to the integrated table > often (e.g. as foreign key in other tables), it may be a good idea to give it > a new sequence. So the integrated table will have location, the sequence > number at the remote site, and a unique local sequence number. Thanks folks, I have decided to mix and match, I have changed the primary key to a text field and created a function that merges the location ID and the sequence like '46-153453' So I can still get the data from specific sites if needed and have only one key... -- Rob Brown-Bayliss ---======o======--- www.ZOOstation.cc