Re: [HACKERS] Re: HISTORY for 6.5.2
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
From: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
To: Theo Kramer <theo@flame.co.za>, "pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 1999-09-18T20:27:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Theo Kramer wrote: > Dont know if it's been raised before, but the postgres utilities are installed > into /usr/bin from the rpm. Problem with this is the naming of some of the > utilities eg.createuser, destroyuser. These could be confused with the > 'standard' user utilities such as useradd, userdel etc. How about pre-pending > a 'pg' to all postgres utilities so that these become pgcreateuser, > pgdestroyuser etc.? This is an interesting idea. What is also interesting is that if you have a traditional postgresql installation (/usr/local/pgsql), you can get even wierder results if /usr/bin contains one createuser and /usr/local/pgsql/bin contains another. Depending upon your PATH, you could get unwanted results in a hurry. So, it IS an interesting thought -- while it would initially create a good deal of confusion, what is the consensus of the hackers on this issue?? Prepending "pg_" to all postgresql commands seems to me to be a good idea (after all, we already hav pg_dump, pg_dumpall, pg_upgrade, etc.). Thoughts?? Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio