Horton

Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)

Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski <me@komzpa.net>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>
Date: 2020-03-16T21:30:01Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Mon, 2020-03-16 at 16:07 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Best practice is to vacuum following bulk load.

Yes.

> If it's a bulk load, then I think it's okay to assume it was vacuumed,

No.  This patch is there precisely because too many people don't know
that they should vacuum their table after a bulk insert.
The idea of autovacuum is to do these things for you atomatically.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Commits

  1. Further improve stability fix for partition_aggregate test.

  2. Improve stability fix for partition_aggregate test.

  3. Attempt to stabilize partitionwise_aggregate test

  4. Fix race condition in statext_store().

  5. Attempt to fix unstable regression tests, take 2

  6. Attempt to fix unstable regression tests

  7. Trigger autovacuum based on number of INSERTs

  8. Fix upper limit for vacuum_cleanup_index_scale_factor