Re: assorted code cleanup

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-09-07T18:00:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 9/5/17 15:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> At one time there were C compilers that only accepted the former syntax.

Correct.  Explanation here: http://c-faq.com/ptrs/funccall.html

> I do agree with the idea that we should use the * notation in cases where
> the reader might otherwise think that a plain function was being invoked,
> ie I don't like
> 
> 	some_function_pointer(args);
> 
> Even if the compiler isn't confused, readers might be.  But in the case of
> 
> 	structname->pointerfield(args);
> 
> it's impossible to read that as a plain function call, so I'm okay with
> dropping the extra punctuation there.

Committed that way.  Thanks.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


Commits

  1. Reduce excessive dereferencing of function pointers