Re: [HACKERS] fsync -> fdatasync in backend/storage/file/fd.c
ocie@paracel.com
From: ocie@paracel.com
To: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker)
Cc: mimo@interdata.com.pl, hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1998-04-17T02:27:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Apr 1998, Michal Mosiewicz wrote: > > > I don't remember if it has been mentioned. > > > > Anyhow, I think that it would be nice to change fsync'es into > > fdatasync'es (of course as an autoconf-igurable option). I don't think > > it's necessary to update all file's metadata each time a file is > > flushed. > > > > I dunno where it's implemented. But it's for sure implemented in Linux. > > We don't have it (FreeBSD)...what does it do? *raised eyebrow* > And, how many ppl actually have fsync's enabled? It's a POSIX thing. fsync will sync the data and the metadata, but fdatasync only syncs the data. So in the case of a crash, the inode might not have the right date, etc. This can speed things up, but I wouldn't venture a guess as to how much. Ocie