Re: [HACKERS] inherited sequences and primary keys

David Gould <dg@illustra.com>

From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
To: mgittens@gits.nl (Maurice Gittens)
Cc: brett@work.chicken.org, pgsql-questions@hub.org, pgsql-hackers@hub.org
Date: 1998-04-03T07:31:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Maurice:
> IMO the current semantics for inheritance in Postgresql are broken.

It seems that way.

> I've been wanting to do something about it but I got distracted and started
> to debug some other problems in the system.
> 
> I hope to get back to this some time.
> 
> I personally feel that we have to make some choices:
> 
>     Is postgresql going to be an Object Relational dbms or is it going to
>     be yet another relation dbms?
> 
> When the developers make an explicite choice on this point it will be a 
> Good Thing (tm).

Agreed. There are lots of pretty decent relation dbms's out there. There are
very few Object Relational dbms's. I happen to think ORDBMS is a really cool
idea and have seen some great applications done with it that a straight
up RDBMS just couldn't do. So my vote is for ORDBMS.

That said, postgresql needs to become a much better RDBMS that it currently
is.

-dg

David Gould            dg@illustra.com           510.628.3783 or 510.305.9468 
Informix Software  (No, really)         300 Lakeside Drive  Oakland, CA 94612
 - Linux. Not because it is free. Because it is better.