Re: [HACKERS] patch for memory overrun on Linux(i386)
David Gould <dg@illustra.com>
From: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
To: maillist@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: mgittens@gits.nl, scrappy@hub.org, mgittens@david.gits.nl, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1998-03-22T22:28:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> > > >That said, I have a plan in mind to get a nice performance boost for > > palloc(). > > >As a side effect, I will guarantee 8 byte alignment of pointers returned > > >from palloc(). > > > > > Does this imply that more memory will be used that strictly necesary under > > linux? > > > > With regards from Maurice. > > Actually, perhaps less memory, because malloc memory is not aligned on > double boundaries, but this is all still just conjecture. Ok, you've convinced me. Sheesh... Change the description to "nice performance boost and use less memory". ;-) -dg David Gould dg@illustra.com 510.628.3783 or 510.305.9468 Informix Software (No, really) 300 Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612 - I realize now that irony has no place in business communications.