Thread

1. Re: [HACKERS] AIX port s_lock.h __AIX --> _AIX

   Darren King <darrenk@insightdist.com> — 1998-02-10T14:33:47Z

   > > I have noticed with delight, that the defined(aix) directives have gone
   > > away (since it is not allways defined),
   > > now there is another one in s_lock.h    __AIX  with two underscores,
   > > wich also is not defined by gcc.
   > > Please use the singel underscore _AIX since it seems to be defined by
   > > all compilers.
   > 
   > 	Darren?  can you confirm before we make any changes?
   > 
   
   I agree with Andreas.  Aix systems here seem to prefer _AIX (with only
   one underscore).
   
   darrenk
   
   

2. Re: [HACKERS] AIX port s_lock.h __AIX --> _AIX

   Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 1998-02-13T05:09:58Z

   On Tue, 10 Feb 1998, Darren King wrote:
   
   > > > I have noticed with delight, that the defined(aix) directives have gone
   > > > away (since it is not allways defined),
   > > > now there is another one in s_lock.h    __AIX  with two underscores,
   > > > wich also is not defined by gcc.
   > > > Please use the singel underscore _AIX since it seems to be defined by
   > > > all compilers.
   > > 
   > > 	Darren?  can you confirm before we make any changes?
   > > 
   > 
   > I agree with Andreas.  Aix systems here seem to prefer _AIX (with only
   > one underscore).
   
   	Someone want to send me a patch to fix this?  or a list of files
   that need to be changed?
   
   Marc G. Fournier                                
   Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
   primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org