Horton
Menu

Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-23T18:35:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info> writes:
> So the question remains, how do we name this?

>      --pg-dump-options "<string>"
>      --pg-restore-options "<string>"

If you're passing multiple options, that is

	--pg-dump-options "--foo=x --bar=y"

it seems just horribly fragile.  Lose the double quotes and suddenly
--bar is a separate option to pg_upgrade itself, not part of the argument
for the previous option.  That's pretty easy to do when passing things
through shell scripts, too.  So it'd likely be safer to write

	--pg-dump-option=--foo=x --pg-dump-option=--bar=y

which requires pg_upgrade to allow aggregating multiple options,
but you'd probably want it to act that way anyway.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Count individual SQL commands in pg_restore's --transaction-size mode.

  2. Reduce number of commands dumpTableSchema emits for binary upgrade.

  3. Invent --transaction-size option for pg_restore.

  4. Rearrange pg_dump's handling of large objects for better efficiency.

  5. Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints

  6. Fix typo and case in messages