Re: partition -> partitioned
Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-05-17T02:48:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2018/05/17 11:40, David Rowley wrote: > On 17 May 2018 at 13:52, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> Commit 499be013de6 used 'partition' where it really meant 'partitioned' in >> a few places including in a variable name. For example, what almost all >> places call 'partitioned_rels', make_partition_pruneinfo called >> 'partition_rels'. >> >> Attached a patch to make that uniform to avoid confusion. > > Looks good to me. Thanks for taking a look at it. Regards, Amit
Commits
-
Consistently use the term 'partitioned rel' in partprune comments
- 8f97af60d19a 11.0 landed
-
Support partition pruning at execution time
- 499be013de65 11.0 cited