Horton

Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@enterprisedb.com>, Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-03-20T14:35:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> On 19.03.25 20:25, Matheus Alcantara wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 3:56 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Buildfarm member snakefly doesn't like this too much.

> I was able to reproduce the problem from scratch using:

> ./configure ...
> make  # no contrib
> make -C src/test/modules/test_extensions check

> So it depended on in which order you build the various components.

That makes sense, but I wonder how snakefly hit it while other BF
animals did not.  It's running a reasonably up-to-date BF client
version and there's nothing odd-looking about its configuration.

Anyway, I see snakefly is green now so that tweak did fix it.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. doc: Flesh out extension docs for the "prefix" make variable

  2. Fix extension control path tests

  3. extension_control_path