Re: Proof of concept: auto updatable views [Review of Patch]
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>, "robertmhaas@gmail.com" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-11-07T22:55:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:04:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Should we be doing something >> about such cases, or is playing dumb correct? > The SQL standard handles deciding the behavior based on whether WITH > CHECK OPTION is included in the view DDL. See the section 2 of the > SQL standard (Foundation) for details. Ah, I see it. So as long as we don't support WITH CHECK OPTION, we can ignore the issue. regards, tom lane