Horton
Menu

Re: New GUC autovacuum_max_threshold ?

Frédéric Yhuel <frederic.yhuel@dalibo.com>

View thread
From: Frédéric Yhuel <frederic.yhuel@dalibo.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: "Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-18T10:36:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

Le 18/06/2024 à 05:06, Nathan Bossart a écrit :
> I didn't see a commitfest entry for this, so I created one to make sure we
> don't lose track of this:
> 
> 	https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/5046/
> 

OK thanks!

By the way, I wonder if there were any off-list discussions after 
Robert's conference at PGConf.dev (and I'm waiting for the video of the 
conf).

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Introduce autovacuum_vacuum_max_threshold.

  2. Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection