Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, sandeep.thakkar@enterprisedb.com
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, Tom Lane
<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-08-21T15:56:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- test-c99.c (text/plain)
On 16/08/2018 15:00, Andres Freund wrote: >> According to my research (completely untested in practice), you need >> 2010 for mixed code and declarations and 2013 for named initialization >> of structs. >> >> I wonder what raising the msvc requirement would imply for supporting >> older Windows versions. > One relevant tidbit is that afaict 2013 still allows *targeting* older > versions of windows, down to XP and 2003, while requiring a newer > platforms to run. See: > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/productinfo/vs2013-compatibility-vs > I don't know if that's hard to do, but I strongly suspect that the > existing installers already do that (otherwise supporting newer versions > would likely require separate builds). So, does anyone with Windows build experience want to comment on this? The proposal is to desupport anything older than (probably) MSVC 2013, or alternatively anything that cannot compile the attached test file. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove test for VA_ARGS, implied by C99.
- 8ecdefc261ab 12.0 landed
-
Introduce minimal C99 usage to verify compiler support.
- 143290efd079 12.0 landed
-
Require C99 (and thus MSCV 2013 upwards).
- d9dd406fe281 12.0 landed
-
Require a C99-compliant snprintf(), and remove related workarounds.
- e1d19c902e59 12.0 landed
-
Try to enable C99 in configure, but do not rely on it (yet).
- 86d78ef50e01 12.0 landed
-
Make snprintf.c follow the C99 standard for snprintf's result value.
- c2a2e331da17 9.6.11 landed
- 1811900b933c 10.6 landed
- 36147ec9f1e2 11.0 landed
- a57a6faf6011 9.3.25 landed
- 27c4b0899c0e 9.4.20 landed
- 8e9f229d2bf6 9.5.15 landed
- 805889d7d23f 12.0 landed
-
Clean up assorted misuses of snprintf()'s result value.
- d7ed4eea539d 11.0 landed
- d371efb39c33 9.4.20 landed
- c81062e8e12f 9.5.15 landed
- c182c1e0b895 9.6.11 landed
- 6101bc2f459c 10.6 landed
- 3531365de5e8 9.3.25 landed
- cc4f6b778618 12.0 landed