Re: Finer Extension dependencies
David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com>
From: "David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-03-29T19:00:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mar 29, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > Frankly, I'm not sure we bet on the right horse in not mandating a > version numbering scheme from the beginning. But given that we > didn't, we probably don't want to get too forceful about it too > quickly. However, we could ease into it by documenting a recommended > numbering scheme and making features like version-dependencies work > only when that scheme is used. PGXN mandates semantic versions for this reason (currently v1.0.0): http://semver.org/spec/v1.0.0.html Removes all the ambiguity. David