Re: First feature patch for plperl - draft [PATCH]

On Dec 4, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:

> Robert's comparison with mod_perl is very apt. Preloading code gives
> dramatic performance gains in production situations where there's a
> significant codebase and connections are frequent.
> 
> The docs for plperl.on_perl_init could include a section relating to
> it's use with shared_preload_libraries. That could document any issues
> and caveats you feel are important.

+1

Tom, what's your objection to Shlib load time being user-visible?

Best,

David