Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?

Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>

From: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
To: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-04-11T09:28:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 10:31 AM Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote:
> > One more version, hopefully to make cfbot happy (I missed the bug because I
> > did not set the RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE macro in my environment.)
> 
> Thanks for the new version! I'm starting to study this patch series and
> I just want to share some points about the documentation on v12-0004:

Please check the next version [1]. Thanks for your input.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/97795.1744363522%40localhost

-- 
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com



Commits

  1. Add CONCURRENTLY option to REPACK

  2. Introduce the REPACK command

  3. Adjust signature of cluster_rel() and its subroutines

  4. Simplify signature of RewriteTable