Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?
Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
From: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
To: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>,
Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com>,
Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>,
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-04-11T09:28:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 10:31 AM Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> wrote: > > One more version, hopefully to make cfbot happy (I missed the bug because I > > did not set the RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE macro in my environment.) > > Thanks for the new version! I'm starting to study this patch series and > I just want to share some points about the documentation on v12-0004: Please check the next version [1]. Thanks for your input. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/97795.1744363522%40localhost -- Antonin Houska Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
Commits
-
Add CONCURRENTLY option to REPACK
- 28d534e2ae0a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce the REPACK command
- ac58465e0618 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Adjust signature of cluster_rel() and its subroutines
- cc811f92bac5 18.0 landed
-
Simplify signature of RewriteTable
- ebd8fc7e47fd 18.0 cited