Re: valgrind error in subscription code

On 22/04/17 20:31, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I enabled skink / the valgrind animal to run the tap tests too (hugely
> increasing the test time :(), and that paid of:
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=skink&dt=2017-04-22%2004%3A52%3A13
> 
> ==606== VALGRINDERROR-BEGIN
> ==606== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
> ==606==    at 0x46A207: logicalrep_rel_open (relation.c:361)
> ==606==    by 0x472D12: copy_table (tablesync.c:669)
> ==606==    by 0x473186: LogicalRepSyncTableStart (tablesync.c:803)
> ==606==    by 0x475287: ApplyWorkerMain (worker.c:1530)
> ==606==    by 0x440AFD: StartBackgroundWorker (bgworker.c:835)
> ==606==    by 0x44E48A: do_start_bgworker (postmaster.c:5577)
> ==606==    by 0x44E59F: maybe_start_bgworker (postmaster.c:5761)
> ==606==    by 0x44F11D: sigusr1_handler (postmaster.c:5015)
> ==606==    by 0x4E430BF: ??? (in /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread-2.24.so)
> ==606==    by 0x6FB8212: __select_nocancel (syscall-template.S:84)
> ==606==    by 0x44F868: ServerLoop (postmaster.c:1693)
> ==606==    by 0x450C53: PostmasterMain (postmaster.c:1337)
> ==606==  Uninitialised value was created by a heap allocation
> ==606==    at 0x605382: MemoryContextAlloc (mcxt.c:729)
> ==606==    by 0x5E4E6A: DynaHashAlloc (dynahash.c:266)
> ==606==    by 0x5E4EEE: element_alloc (dynahash.c:1637)
> ==606==    by 0x5E5018: get_hash_entry (dynahash.c:1248)
> ==606==    by 0x5E5898: hash_search_with_hash_value (dynahash.c:1033)
> ==606==    by 0x5E5A0D: hash_search (dynahash.c:890)
> ==606==    by 0x469D38: logicalrep_relmap_update (relation.c:179)
> ==606==    by 0x472D05: copy_table (tablesync.c:666)
> ==606==    by 0x473186: LogicalRepSyncTableStart (tablesync.c:803)
> ==606==    by 0x475287: ApplyWorkerMain (worker.c:1530)
> ==606==    by 0x440AFD: StartBackgroundWorker (bgworker.c:835)
> ==606==    by 0x44E48A: do_start_bgworker (postmaster.c:5577)
> ==606== 
> ==606== VALGRINDERROR-END

Thanks, here is patch to fix that - I also removed the individual
settings of everything to NULL/0/InvalidOid etc and just replaced it all
with memset.

-- 
  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services