Re: Feature: temporary materialized views
Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-02-04T15:10:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/4/19 7:09 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:10:17AM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote: >> On 1/21/19 3:31 AM, Andreas Karlsson wrote: >>> Here is a a stab at refactoring this so the object creation does not >>> happen in a callback. >> >> Rebased my patch on top of Andres's pluggable storage patches. Plus some >> minor style changes. > > Taking a note to look at this refactoring bit, which is different from > the temp matview part. Moved to next CF for now. Should I submit it as a separate CF entry or is it easiest if my refactoring and Mi Tar's feature are reviewed together? Andreas
Commits
-
Add more tests for CREATE TABLE AS with WITH NO DATA
- 537898bd81bd 12.0 landed