Re: Feature: temporary materialized views

Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-02-04T15:10:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/4/19 7:09 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:10:17AM +0100, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
>> On 1/21/19 3:31 AM, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
>>> Here is a a stab at refactoring this so the object creation does not
>>> happen in a callback.
>>
>> Rebased my patch on top of Andres's pluggable storage patches. Plus some
>> minor style changes.
> 
> Taking a note to look at this refactoring bit, which is different from
> the temp matview part.  Moved to next CF for now.

Should I submit it as a separate CF entry or is it easiest if my 
refactoring and Mi Tar's feature are reviewed together?

Andreas


Commits

  1. Add more tests for CREATE TABLE AS with WITH NO DATA