Re: [oauth] Increased CPU usage during device flow with libcurl 8.20.0
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, rmt@lists.postgresql.org,
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,
Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-06-16T21:02:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> writes: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 1:40 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> However ... I don't love the plan of fixing this differently in v19 >> and v20 just because of feature freeze. Exposing more information >> for testing purposes isn't a user-visible feature IMO, so I would >> rather we go straight to 0004. > Fair enough. If the RMT is okay with this for 19, were you thinking > we'd also backpatch that code directly to 18? Sure. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
oauth: Skip call-count test for libcurl 8.20.0
- c5c35fd7c55c 18 (unreleased) landed
- fd5ea2e9e37c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
libpq-oauth: Print libcurl version with OAUTHDEBUG_UNSAFE_TRACE
- 357e4d64f871 18 (unreleased) landed
- 4bd477dcc619 19 (unreleased) landed