Re: pg_upgrade code questions
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-05-13T15:37:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> I have added SGML comments to comment out the text that mentions EDB >> Advanced Server. Is that enough? Should I remove the text from the >> SGML? Should I move it to the bottom of the SGML? Should I remove the >> EnterpriseDB Advanced Server checks from the C code too? I don't >> remember having to deal with anything like this before, so I am unclear >> how to proceed. > I say remove it. On all accounts. > There's a fork of postgres for EDB AS, shouldn't there be a fork of > pg_upgrade the same way, if it requires special code? The code in > community postgresql certainly shouldn't have any EDB AS code in it. Indeed. Given the (presumably large) delta between EDB's code and ours, having to have some delta in pg_upgrade isn't going to make much difference for them. I think the community code and docs should completely omit any mention of that. regards, tom lane