Re: Recent vendor SSL renegotiation patches break PostgreSQL
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Michael Ledford <mledford@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-02-03T18:44:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes: > FWIW I think there's another problem with streaming replication here, > which is that most data flows from client to server, so it would take > quite some time for the threshold to be reached. Note that there's no > size check in the libpq frontend code. Normally this is not an issue > because the bulk of data is expected to flow in the other direction. Huh? I thought the slaves connect to the master, rather than the other way round? It's true that libpq doesn't contain any such code, but that seems like a fortunate thing right at the moment, as it limits the number of places we might have to hack something. regards, tom lane