Re: Change copyObject() to use typeof_unqual

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>, tharar@amazon.com
Date: 2026-06-13T15:56:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> writes:
> For some reason, a couple of animals running gcc-15 or newer
> (leafhopper, massasauga, parula) appear to be failing now because of
> this.

They just started failing a day or two ago, so it's hard to blame
it on any code change we made.  I see that all three of those animals
are using "experimental" nightly builds of gcc, so it's reasonable to
assume that gcc's git tip is broken.  Or maybe something needs updated
in the recipe for replacing their gcc builds.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add some const qualifiers enabled by typeof_unqual change on copyObject

  2. Hardcode typeof_unqual to __typeof_unqual__ for clang

  3. Clean up postgres_fdw/t/010_subscription.pl.

  4. Hardcode override of typeof_unqual for clang-for-bitcode

  5. Make typeof and typeof_unqual fallback definitions work on C++11

  6. Change copyObject() to use typeof_unqual

  7. Fixes for C++ typeof implementation

  8. Support using copyObject in standard C++