Re: Unbounded %s in sscanf

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>

Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2021-10-15T14:07:21Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> I propose to apply the attached all the way down (with the basebackup hunk from
> 11), or down to 10 if we want to be conservative with the final 9.6 re ancient
> bugs that haven't seen complaints.

LGTM.  No objection to applying this in 9.6.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

Fix bug in TOC file error message printing
- ef1f15819a38 9.6.24 landed
- e788883de715 12.9 landed
- 998d060f3db7 15.0 landed
- 687fe8a9d7a6 13.5 landed
- 4fda03b671a6 10.19 landed
- 3e2f32b01d3b 14.1 landed
- 038892c81018 11.14 landed
Fix sscanf limits in pg_basebackup and pg_dump
- d3a4c1eb3d21 13.5 landed
- 931f3926a9f6 11.14 landed
- 57bf8f7b75ec 12.9 landed
- 1d7641d51a51 15.0 landed
- 121be6a665aa 14.1 landed
Fix sscanf limits in pg_dump
- abdf81a20ba2 10.19 landed
- 6b96aafc67ac 9.6.24 landed