Re: PostgreSQL and OpenSSL 4.0.0

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-05-08T07:21:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On 8 May 2026, at 09:17, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 09:07:41AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> Not sure I follow, anyone still building with a X years out of support OpenSSL
>> will most likely keep doing so regardless of what CVE's are published.  It
>> could of course make backpatching trickier if thats what you mean?
> 
> Argh.  I've misread you here, reading a "lowest" rather than
> "highest".   Documenting that 3.6 is the highest version support on 
> 14-stable would also work here.  My apologies for the confusion.

Ah, now it makes more sense =)

> If the patches for REL_14_STABLE to add support for 4.0 prove to be
> low-risk while messing with 1.0.1, that would the best course of
> action, of course.

I think the changes are straightforward enough that we can go ahead with them.
I'll re-test and re-post a new patchset for all branches once the minors ship.

--
Daniel Gustafsson