Re: ALTER EXTENSION SET SCHEMA versus dependent types

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 07:42:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> One positive reason for increasing the number of parameters is that
>> that will be a clear API break for any outside callers, if there
>> are any.  If I just replace a bool with an enum, such callers might
>> or might not get any indication that they need to take a fresh
>> look.

> Agreed.  Another option could be to just annotate the arguments with the
> parameter names.

At the call sites you mean?  Sure, I can do that.

			regards, tom lane