Questionable ping logic in LogicalRepApplyLoop
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-09-04T19:41:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
While playing around with clang's scan-build I noticed this warning:
worker.c:2281:7: warning: Value stored to 'ping_sent' is never read
ping_sent = true;
^ ~~~~
At first I thought it was a harmless unnecessary update, but looking
closer I wonder whether it isn't telling us there is a logic bug here.
Specifically, I wonder why the "ping_sent" variable is local to the
loop starting at line 2084, rather than having the same lifespan as
"last_recv_timestamp". Do we really want to forget that we sent a
ping anytime we have to wait for more data?
In fact, looking closer, it appears to me that
(1) The "ping_sent = false" at line 2124 is also dead code, because
ping_sent could never be anything but false at this point;
(2) The "if (!ping_sent)" at line 2274 is also dead code, because
ping_sent is still never anything but false at that point.
In short, we could remove the ping_sent variable entirely without
changing this code's behavior. I'm not 100% sure what semantics
it's trying to achieve, but I don't think it's achieving them.
regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix over-eager ping'ing in logical replication receiver.
- 9b81a30f924c 13.0 landed
- c8746f999ea2 14.0 landed
- 9b8a8516ed2e 10.15 landed
- 9b47ee6e7cba 12.5 landed
- 7156a0eac3af 11.10 landed
-
Fix timeout handling in logical replication worker
- 3f60f690fac1 13.0 cited