Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-11T14:00:55Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> _bt_mark_page_halfdead() looked like it had a problem, but it now
> looks like I was wrong. I also verified every other
> BTreeInnerTupleGetDownLink() caller. It now looks like everything is
> good here.

Right - it tries to find right page by conlsulting in parent page, by taking of 
next key.



-- 
Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                                    WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/


Commits

  1. Adjust INCLUDE index truncation comments and code.

  2. Add commentary explaining why MaxIndexTuplesPerPage calculation is safe.

  3. Indexes with INCLUDE columns and their support in B-tree

  4. Add amcheck verification of heap relations belonging to btree indexes.

  5. Doc: move info for btree opclass implementors into main documentation.

  6. Doc: mention that you can't PREPARE TRANSACTION after NOTIFY.

  7. Remove dedicated B-tree root-split record types.

  8. Restructure index access method API to hide most of it at the C level.

  9. Split _bt_insertonpg to two functions.

  10. Major overhaul of btree index code. Eliminate special BTP_CHAIN logic for