Horton

Re: stress test for parallel workers

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>, Mark Wong <mark@2ndquadrant.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-10-13T14:57:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2019-10-13 10:29:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> How recent do you think it needs to be?

> My experience reporting kernel bugs is that the latest released version,
> or even just the tip of the git tree, is your best bet :/.

Considering that we're going to point them at chapter and verse in
Torvald's own repo, I do not think they can claim that we're worried
about obsolete code.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. In the postmaster, rely on the signal infrastructure to block signals.

  2. Paper over regression failures in infinite_recurse() on PPC64 Linux.

  3. Hack pg_ctl to report postmaster's exit status.

  4. Re-order some regression test scripts for more parallelism.