Re: BUG #18722: Processing arrays with plpgsql raises errors

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: exclusion@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-11-24T01:42:00Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Attachments

PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> The following script:
> CREATE FUNCTION make_ia() RETURNS int[] LANGUAGE plpgsql AS
>   'declare x int[]; begin x := array[0]; return x; end';
> CREATE FUNCTION ia_eq(int[], int[]) RETURNS boolean LANGUAGE plpgsql AS
> 'begin return array_eq($1, $2); end'; 
> CREATE OPERATOR = (procedure = ia_eq, leftarg = int[], rightarg = int[]);
> SELECT NULLIF(make_ia(), array[1]::int[]);

> fails with:
> ERROR:  cache lookup failed for type 2139062143

Nice catch!  What is happening here is that make_ia returns a
read/write pointer to an expanded array object.  The EEOP_NULLIF
code passes that pointer straight on to the equality function.
Which in this case is a plpgsql function that will suppose it
can take ownership of the expanded object, resulting in said
object being freed before return.  (Neither function has done
anything wrong.)  The problem is that EEOP_NULLIF then returns
the original Datum pointer, which is now pointing at garbage.
The different failures you get depending on what is done next
with the Datum are not too surprising.

What EEOP_NULLIF needs to do is pass a read-only pointer to the
equality function, so that the object is not modified and remains
available to return if we want to do so.

Attached is a quick WIP patch to handle that.  It is missing a test
case, but the real omission is that llvm_compile_expr()'s EEOP_NULLIF
handling also needs to be fixed, and I'm pretty unsure how to do that.

I'm wondering now if any of our other conditional expressions have
similar bugs ...

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Fix NULLIF()'s handling of read-write expanded objects.