Horton

Re: Rejecting weak passwords

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>, mlortiz <mlortiz@uci.cu>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-09-29T15:02:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Why do we need to answer that question? If all we do is provide a hook, 
> the cost is very low, and the decision on value is left to whoever is 
> deploying some module to use the hook.

Right.  As long as it's just a hook, it's not enough work to justify
lots of debate.  There is a plausible use-case, and that's enough.

			regards, tom lane