Re: Application name patch - v4
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
From: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Date: 2009-12-02T08:34:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> If we patch the back branches like that, anyone who's annoyed by the >> extra connection cycle just has to update to latest minor release >> of their server to make it work more smoothly. Comments? >> >> regards, tom lane > > Given that this can probably be considered an *extremely* safe patch > :-), I say go for it. It'll certainly make for less error reports > around something that's not an error. > > If the patch was in any way complex I'd object against it, but this > clearly isn't... Agreed. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com